- Record: Senate Floor
- Section type: Floor speeches
- Chamber: Senate
- Date: March 22, 2026
- Congress: 119th Congress
- Why this source matters: This section came from the Senate floor portion of the record.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2026—Motion to
Proceed—Resumed
- Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, I move to proceed to Calendar No. 311, H.R.
-
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will report.
The senior assistant legislative clerk read as follows:
Motion to proceed to Calendar No. 311, H.R. 7147, a bill
making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes.
SAVE America Act
Mr. THUNE. Mr. President, it is rare for the Senate to be in session on a Sunday. Needless to say, the fact that we are here today tells you that what we are doing is important work; and that is the SAVE America Act. The core of the SAVE America Act is securing American elections, and a big way the bill accomplishes that is with two commonsense policies: requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote and requiring a photo ID when you go to cast a ballot.
the American public. In fact, one poll showed that most Americans think you already—already—have to prove you are a citizen in order to register to vote.
benefits. Proof of citizenship or legal status is required when you go to join the military. And every job in this country requires new hires to fill out a form I-9, proving that they are a citizen or otherwise eligible to work in this country.
shouldn't we expect it when Americans go to register to vote? It is just common sense. But under current law, you don't need to prove you are actually eligible to vote when you register.
vote have been challenged in court, and courts have said that States cannot go beyond the requirements of the standard Federal voter registration form created by the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, a form that does not—does not—require voters to prove that they are American citizens. The SAVE America Act would fix that by requiring that individuals provide proof of citizenship when they register to vote.
Americans support it; 36 States already require it—red States, blue States, swing States. And I suspect that one of the reasons requiring a photo ID seems so common sense to Americans is because showing a photo ID is something the American people have to do for a whole host of other things in their daily lives.
If you drive a car, you need to have a license with you. If you do an early pickup at your kid's school, you need to show a photo ID. If you want to get a library card, you need a photo ID. And, as I pointed out the other day, Washington, DC, requires a photo ID to use a city recreation center. But you can vote—you can vote in DC—perhaps even in that same rec center that requires an ID to play basketball, without showing an ID. That doesn't make any sense.
Republicans aren't asking for much here. We are just asking to make our elections as secure as the local rec center.
some sort of intolerable burden to place on voters, since the SAVE America Act debate began, they have spent a lot of time hedging on this issue. In fact, on Tuesday, Leader Schumer announced that Democrats now support voter ID.
current Presiding Officer and a former chief election official in his State—offered a bill to require photo ID to vote. That is all it would have done, require a photo ID when you go to the polls—driver's license, military ID, Tribal ID, passport. And Democrats—Democrats— blocked it. And they more than blocked it. Their response was to offer a bill that included, if you can believe this, a nationwide ban on voter ID for absentee ballots.
That is right. Democrats, who now claim to support voter ID, proposed a nationwide ban on voter ID requirements—requirements that already exist in a number of States, including my State of South Dakota.
- what them opposing it would look like.
support commonsense voter integrity measures, including—including— voter ID, and every Democrat will be put on the record for the American people to see.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. SULLIVAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so ordered.