Sponsors (2)
The bill creates a single, government-wide standard to identify and address antisemitism—which can improve detection, protections, and consistency across courts and schools—but risks chilling political speech, increasing litigation and implementation costs, and creating disputes over interpretation and unequal emphasis among protected groups.
Federal, state, and local officials will have a single, widely endorsed definition to identify and track antisemitic incidents, improving monitoring, data consistency, and coordination with multilateral partners.
Jewish individuals and communities will get clearer recognition of antisemitic acts, which should improve detection, targeted protections, and civil‑rights remedies.
Federal employees will receive clearer guidance and standardized definitions that improve workplace protections, complaint handling, and consistent agency enforcement.
Students, protesters, campus speakers, and other members of the public may face a chilling effect on protected political speech and criticism (including about Israel/Palestine) if IHRA examples are applied broadly.
Schools, employers, courts, and agencies will face increased litigation and legal uncertainty over how IHRA examples are interpreted and when jury instructions or other actions must be given.
Taxpayers, agencies, and courts will incur administrative costs to update training, retrain staff, add jury instruction content, and defend against litigation.
Based on analysis of 7 sections of legislative text.
Requires federal agencies, courts, and civil‑rights reviewers to adopt and use the IHRA working definition of antisemitism in training, jury instructions, and civil‑rights reviews under listed statutes.
Official title: To provide a definition of antisemitism for the enforcement of covered civil rights laws.
Introduced June 23, 2025 by Barry Moore · Last progress June 23, 2025
Requires federal agencies, courts, and civil-rights reviewers to adopt and use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism (May 26, 2016) in training, jury instructions for cases that involve antisemitism, and in investigations or determinations under specified civil‑rights laws. The law also defines the covered statutes, lists illustrative examples from the IHRA definition, and clarifies that it does not expand enforcement authority or limit First Amendment rights.