Sponsors (9)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Requires FEMA to move faster and more systematically on extreme temperature risks by convening an expert advisory panel, studying impacts of extreme heat and cold, issuing guidance for preparedness and mitigation, and allowing certain cooling, resilience, and household-level projects to be treated as eligible FEMA activities. Deadlines include convening the panel within 6 months, issuing interim and final reports, and completing study and guidance within one year (final report within two years), followed by rulemaking to implement recommendations.
The bill strengthens preparedness and direct supports for extreme heat/cold—especially for vulnerable people and local responders—by standardizing guidance, expanding eligible mitigation actions, and increasing transparency, but it raises administrative and program costs, creates implementation and funding risks for states and localities, and could leave gaps for the most vulnerable if guidance or funding fall short.
Seniors, low‑income households, first responders, and health systems will have more immediate protections during extreme heat/cold because the bill authorizes cooling/resilience centers, emergency vouchers, stockpiled equipment, and related installations and training.
State and local emergency managers will receive standardized FEMA guidance and clarified definitions within a year, improving planning, consistent implementation, and preparedness across jurisdictions.
Communities, utilities, and infrastructure managers will have clearer eligibility and analysis to pursue hazard mitigation and infrastructure projects that reduce extreme‑heat risks (e.g., buildings, power, roads), increasing the chance of projects qualifying for federal assistance.
Taxpayers, federal, state, and local governments will face increased costs because the bill requires reports, new grant and equipment programs, staff time, and administrative work without specifying new offsets.
Low‑income households and seniors may still go without timely assistance if guidance, eligibility, or program rollout is unclear or limited despite the new authorities.
States and localities may not see real improvements quickly because recommendations and guidance do not guarantee funding—implementation could be delayed or unfunded at the state/local level.
Introduced May 29, 2025 by Alice Costandina Titus · Last progress May 29, 2025