Sponsors
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates a state-level, regionally adjusted poverty measure and directs federal agencies to use whichever poverty line (the new regional measure or the existing federal line) produces a higher poverty rate for a State when making administrative eligibility decisions for federal programs. It also requires an independent study of the ALICE (Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed) threshold to evaluate whether that measure could improve how material need is measured and used for program eligibility. The Census Bureau must publish the new state-by-state “Regionally Adjusted Poverty Line” annually, the Department of Health and Human Services (with HUD consultation) must select the higher-rate poverty line for each State for administrative use (with a limited exception for premium tax credit determinations in certain States), and the Government Accountability Office must report to Congress within two years on the ALICE threshold and how it might be incorporated into federal eligibility rules. The new poverty index takes effect one year after enactment; the HHS administrative-use requirement takes effect three years after enactment.
The bill improves targeting and eligibility for low-income households—especially in higher-cost States and territories—by standardizing cost-adjusted poverty measures, but it raises fiscal costs and administrative complexity and may produce inconsistent eligibility across programs and jurisdictions.
Low-income households—especially in higher-cost States and territories—would qualify under higher, cost-adjusted poverty thresholds, increasing eligibility for means-tested programs (SNAP, Medicaid, housing assistance) and improving access to benefits.
State and federal policymakers, researchers, and program administrators would get a consistent, standardized, annually published set of cost-adjusted poverty measures (RPP/ALICE/Census alternatives) to better target resources, evaluate programs, and increase transparency about eligibility standards.
Residents of territories and agencies serving them benefit from clarified definitions and standardized inclusion of territories (e.g., Puerto Rico, DC) so measures and programs apply consistently across States and territories.
Federal and state program costs would rise because higher or broader poverty thresholds expand program rolls, increasing fiscal pressure on taxpayers and state budgets.
Annual updates and new/alternative metrics will impose substantial administrative burdens—requiring agencies to update eligibility systems, rely on external data (BEA/Census), and manage compliance—raising implementation costs and complexity for program implementers.
Using multiple thresholds and waivers (ALICE, RPP-adjusted poverty, Census poverty, CSBG line, Premium Tax Credit waiver) risks inconsistent eligibility across programs and States, creating confusion and unequal access for low-income and uninsured individuals.
Introduced January 23, 2025 by Mikie Sherrill · Last progress January 23, 2025