Sponsors (8)
The bill strengthens anti‑trafficking protections, transparency, and oversight (including protections for diplomatic domestic workers and MDB project risk assessment) but pairs those gains with sizable funding cuts, new administrative burdens, and disclosure requirements that could reduce victim services, slow development projects, raise costs for taxpayers and agencies, and create security or diplomatic risks.
Nonprofits and U.S. policymakers: the bill preserves authorization for overseas anti‑trafficking diplomatic programs through 2030 and retains International Megan’s Law authorities through 2029, keeping core prevention and victim‑service programs and child‑sex‑trafficking screening tools available.
Congress, oversight bodies, and the public: the bill increases transparency and legislative oversight by requiring GAO review, timely briefings on TIP tier changes, and clearer explanations for Presidential waiver decisions, improving policymakers’ ability to track and respond to trafficking risks and program performance.
People in trafficking‑vulnerable countries and recipients of MDB‑funded projects: the bill requires counter‑trafficking risk assessments and mitigation for Multilateral Development Bank projects, which should reduce forced labor and exploitation risks in projects that affect low‑income communities.
Victims, nonprofits, and foreign partners: the bill sharply reduces authorized State Department anti‑trafficking assistance (e.g., large cuts in overall assistance and to the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons) and imposes an annual funding cap, risking large reductions in grants, victim services, and prevention programs abroad.
U.S. taxpayers and agencies: expanded MDB policy conditions, new reporting, and mandated GAO reviews will increase administrative costs and workload for U.S. agencies and potentially raise costs borne by taxpayers.
People and governments in recipient countries: stricter MDB conditionality, possible reduced access to MDB/IMF financing for Tier 2 watch‑list or Tier 3 countries, and added project compliance requirements could delay or scale back development and infrastructure projects.
Based on analysis of 7 sections of legislative text.
Requires U.S. advocacy for anti‑trafficking measures in MDB projects, changes authorization amounts and caps for anti‑trafficking programs, and mandates briefings and a GAO report on TIP tiering and waivers.
Introduced August 1, 2025 by James Risch · Last progress August 1, 2025
Directs U.S. officials to push that anti‑trafficking risk assessment and mitigation measures be included in projects financed by multilateral development banks for countries at risk for trafficking, and requires briefings and reports to Congress on U.S. actions and country tier changes. Changes federal authorizations for certain anti‑trafficking accounts (including lowering or reformatting some annual authorized amounts and adding a cap for programs to end modern slavery) and extends the authorization period for International Megan’s Law. Also requires timely briefings after public annual Tier rankings and after any Presidential waiver of trafficking‑related sanctions, and mandates a GAO report within two years describing U.S. engagement on forced labor and trafficking in MDB projects.