This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Requires borrowers who seek FHA insurance or loans purchased by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac for manufactured‑home communities to certify that community pad‑site leases include a set of minimum tenant protections, and to submit lease documentation for review. It creates civil remedies and monetary penalties for willful, material violations, bans enterprise pricing incentives that reward weaker protections, establishes a temporary commission to recommend stronger standards within one year, directs FHFA to develop a model site‑lease for enterprise purchase eligibility, and specifies that implementation must be funded from existing HUD and FHFA resources.
The bill strengthens tenant protections and broadens access to conventional financing for manufactured-home residents, but achieves this through new compliance rules, potential liabilities for park owners, and by forcing HUD/FHFA to reallocate existing budgets—creating implementation, legal, and affordability trade-offs for owners, residents, and other HUD beneficiaries.
Renters and homeowners in manufactured home communities gain stronger housing-stability protections (one-year renewable leases, eviction limits, 5-day grace period, 15-day cure right, advance notice for rent increases).
Homebuyers and existing homeowners in parks will have improved access to conventional and enterprise-backed mortgages because more homes become eligible and underwriting friction is reduced.
Owners of homes in parks and prospective buyers retain greater equity and mobility because residents can sell homes in-place, post ‘For Sale’ signs, and assign/sublease sites under uniform criteria.
Park owners and borrowers seeking federally backed financing face new certification, documentation, and compliance requirements to access favorable loan pricing, raising administrative costs and operational burdens.
Owners risk substantial monetary liabilities from mandatory remedies (rent refunds, damages tied to sale price or up to 12 months' rent) that could lead to higher lot rents, reduced investment, or financial distress for smaller owners.
Smaller park owners may be disproportionately harmed by compliance costs and penalties, increasing the risk of consolidation or sale to larger firms, which could reduce local competition.
Introduced March 27, 2025 by Brittany Pettersen · Last progress March 27, 2025