This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates a National Manufacturing Advisory Council inside the Department of Commerce to advise the Secretary on manufacturing policy, workforce development, supply chains, regulatory burdens, and related challenges. The Secretary must establish the council within 180 days, appoint up to 30 members, and ensure regular meetings and public, geographically diverse input. The council must deliver an annual national strategic plan and activity statement to the Secretary and relevant congressional committees, coordinate with federal agencies and education/workforce entities, and assume the functions of the existing U.S. Manufacturing Council. No new funds are authorized and the council sunsets five years after its first meeting.
Creates a recurring federal manufacturing advisory council to strengthen training, supply‑chain resilience, and targeted recovery efforts, but it lacks dedicated funding, has a five‑year sunset, and includes industry representation and discretionary information sharing that could limit effectiveness and transparency.
Manufacturers and workers will have a permanent federal forum advising the Department of Commerce annually on workforce, supply chains, and regulation, creating a regular channel for industry input into federal manufacturing policy.
Students and job-seekers will benefit from improved coordination between colleges, workforce boards, and manufacturers that expands training programs and job pipelines into manufacturing careers.
Small businesses and consumers may see lower costs and fewer supply disruptions because the Council will identify regulatory burdens and recommend mitigation to reduce supply-chain disruptions.
Small businesses and other stakeholders may get limited benefit because no new funding is authorized, so the Council may lack resources to implement recommendations effectively.
Manufacturers and workers face uncertainty about long-term continuity because the Council sunsets after five years, which could stop ongoing initiatives and recommendations.
Workers and consumers could be disadvantaged if private-industry representation biases Council recommendations toward industry interests rather than labor or consumer protections.
Introduced February 5, 2025 by Gary C. Peters · Last progress July 15, 2025