Sponsors (20)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced May 21, 2025 by Alma Adams · Last progress May 21, 2025
Creates a federal grant program to fund comprehensive, evidence-informed sex education and youth-friendly sexual health services and trains educators and providers. It authorizes $100 million per year for FY2026–FY2031, sets program priorities (including tribal and minority-serving institutions), defines required content and service elements, requires nondiscrimination, and mandates reporting and an independent impact evaluation. Establishes detailed definitions and program standards (age- and developmentally-appropriate, medically accurate, trauma-informed, inclusive), directs competitive five-year grants for K–12/youth organizations, higher education, educator training, and sexual health services for underserved young people, and reserves portions of annual funding for specific grant categories and evaluation/research.
The bill channels substantial federal funding and standards to expand comprehensive, inclusive sexual health education and youth services—improving access, equity, and program quality for many young people—while increasing federal costs, administrative burdens, and the likelihood of political, legal, and implementation conflicts in some communities.
Students and young people (K–12 and college-age) will gain substantially expanded access to comprehensive, medically accurate sexual health education that covers puberty, contraception, HIV/STIs, consent, interpersonal violence, and healthy relationships.
Underserved youth will get greater access to sexual health services (e.g., contraception, HPV vaccination, PrEP/PEP, confidential care, trauma-informed survivor services), improving prevention and care availability.
The bill provides new federal grants and dedicated funding (K–12 programs, higher education grants, teacher training, research, technical assistance, and program evaluation), enabling program scale-up, workforce development, and evidence-based improvements.
The bill is likely to prompt legal and political conflicts (over LGBTQ‑inclusive content, parental notification/consent, and curriculum mandates) that could cause litigation, reduce program participation in some communities, and delay implementation.
It creates a meaningful new federal spending commitment (roughly $100M/year and multiple multi‑year grant programs), increasing taxpayer cost and adding recurring budgetary obligations.
Smaller providers, local education agencies, and some grantees may face substantial compliance, administrative, and training costs (application paperwork, reporting, nondiscrimination policies), which could exclude smaller community organizations or reduce funds available for direct services.