Sponsors
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Allows FEMA to treat severe winter storms as qualifying events under the Stafford Act, lets hazard-mitigation funds be used for items like snow-removal equipment, and makes it easier for States to get disaster help for winter storms by creating waiver rules for certain regions. Also raises the Federal cost share for several types of disaster assistance from a 75% baseline to at least 90% when aid is provided in areas the Census Bureau identifies as rural or having below‑median real household income. Requires FEMA rulemaking to define "winter storm," set a waiver process (based on state damage findings, National Weather Service determinations, and Census Bureau area characteristics), and to issue regulations extending a range of Stafford Act assistance to qualifying winter-storm events. The change shifts more of recovery costs to the Federal government for eligible rural or disadvantaged areas and expands allowable mitigation activities to reduce future winter-storm damage.
The bill directs more and more-targeted federal assistance to rural, lower‑income, and storm‑impacted communities—reducing local recovery costs and improving mitigation—at the expense of higher federal spending, potential implementation delays, and risks of uneven access across states and urban areas.
State and local governments and homeowners in storm-affected areas receive expanded federal assistance for winter-storm mitigation, debris removal, road/bridge/public utility repairs, and purchase of snow‑removal equipment, improving recovery capacity and local infrastructure resilience.
Rural and lower‑income residents and the local governments that serve them get at least a 90% Federal cost share for qualifying recovery and cost‑effective mitigation work, substantially lowering local out‑of‑pocket recovery costs and fiscal burdens.
The bill creates clearer, data‑driven eligibility and waiver pathways (using Census Bureau income and urban/rural designations and State findings) to identify disadvantaged or nonurban areas that qualify for higher federal support, making assistance more predictable for those communities.
Taxpayers nationwide face higher federal disaster spending and larger federal outlays to cover expanded assistance and higher federal cost shares, which could raise taxes or crowd out other federal budget priorities.
Granting broad waiver authority and recognition of State-written damage determinations risks uneven standards and unequal access to federal disaster declarations and aid across states, creating potential fairness issues for communities.
Implementation risks — including FEMA rulemaking delays and reliance on Census metrics — could slow delivery of aid, misclassify rapidly changing local economies, and delay or reduce assistance to some affected communities.
Introduced January 15, 2025 by Timothy M. Kennedy · Last progress January 15, 2025