Sponsors (4)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates two related federal grant programs to prevent and reduce childhood trauma by funding data-driven local prevention and early‑intervention efforts and by expanding trauma‑informed care coordination for very young children (ages 0–5) and caregivers, including prenatal people. One program awards up to five state or local health departments grants (up to $9.5M each, up to 7 years) to map high‑need areas, connect children and caregivers to trauma‑informed services, and subgrant to community partners; the other funds local governments and Indian Tribes to create or expand care coordination for children 0–5 in high‑need communities. Both programs require safeguards on permissible uses (e.g., no conversion therapy, no use for coercive child‑removal decisions, limits on law enforcement surveillance), set spending limits for data analysis and administration, require subgrants to community partners, and establish multi‑year federal evaluations and reporting. Congress authorizes funding for grants and evaluations over FY2025–FY2032.
The bill expands trauma‑informed services, workforce capacity, tribal set‑asides, and evidence building for families with young children, but modest funding levels, data/privacy and administrative rules, and funding restrictions could limit reach, complicate coordination with existing programs, and reduce direct service dollars.
Children (especially ages 0–5), their caregivers, and low-income families in targeted/high‑need areas gain access to trauma‑informed services and coordinated referrals (home visiting, care coordination, mental‑health supports, family resource centers, connections to housing/food/behavioral health).
Creates and funds trained frontline positions (care coordinators, community health workers, infant mental‑health specialists) and training, expanding local service capacity and supporting jobs in communities serving young children.
Requires subgrants (minimums) to community partners, directing federal dollars to local, culturally specific and gender‑responsive organizations that serve families.
Funding authorized (modest annual amounts and multi‑year grants) may be too small relative to the national demand, limiting the number, geographic reach, and scale of services available to affected families.
Collecting community and participant data raises privacy and trust concerns, and combined data‑sharing/reporting requirements plus database caps create administrative burdens that could deter participation or strain small jurisdictions and tribal programs.
‘Supplement not supplant’ rules and other funding restrictions may exclude organizations already supported by state/local funds and reduce flexibility to sustain services when federal grants end.
Introduced April 17, 2025 by Ayanna Pressley · Last progress April 17, 2025