Sponsors (2)
Ask me to break this bill down.
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Delays when the federal government can force emergency-relief highway projects into the construction-obligation stage: states get up to six fiscal years after a Governor’s emergency declaration or the President’s major disaster declaration before the Secretary can require construction obligation, with the Secretary allowed to grant extra extensions. The bill also requires the Federal Highway Administration to update and redistribute its Emergency Relief Manual every two years. This change gives State transportation agencies and local governments more time to plan, design, and obligate funds for repair and rebuilding after disasters, while adding a recurring administrative requirement for the FHWA to keep guidance current.
Adds a new subsection (h) to Section 125 of title 23, United States Code, establishing limitations and procedures related to deadlines for advancing Federal-aid highway emergency relief projects.
The Secretary may not require any project funded under Section 125 to advance to the construction obligation stage before the last day of the sixth fiscal year after the later of (A) the date the Governor declared the emergency (as described in subsection (d)(1)(A)) or (B) the date the President declared the emergency a major disaster (as described in that subsection).
If the Secretary imposes the deadline described above, the Secretary may (A) issue, on the request of the Governor, an extension of not more than 1 year to complete advancement to the construction obligation stage, and (B) issue additional extensions after any extension expires if the Secretary determines the Governor has provided suitable justification.
Adds a new subsection (i) to Section 125 of title 23, United States Code, establishing requirements for the Emergency Relief Manual.
Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this subsection and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary shall update the Emergency Relief Manual of the Federal Highway Administration.
Primary effects fall on State governments and their transportation agencies: they gain more time (up to six fiscal years, plus possible extensions) to complete planning, environmental reviews, design, procurement, and other steps before being required to bring emergency-relief projects into the federal construction-obligation stage. That flexibility can help states coordinate with budget cycles, avoid rushed procurements, and complete more complex work (e.g., major bridges or roadway realignments) thoughtfully.
Local governments and communities in disaster-affected areas may see slower transitions from temporary repairs to permanent reconstruction; while this may allow higher-quality planning, it may also prolong reduced roadway access, economic disruption, or safety hazards until construction begins. Contractors and construction firms could face shifts in project timing and pipeline predictability, potentially concentrating work later.
The Federal Highway Administration will incur a predictable administrative responsibility to review, revise, and disseminate the Emergency Relief Manual every two years. That requirement improves clarity and consistency of federal guidance but requires staff time and coordination with state partners.
Overall, the legislation is procedural: it changes timing and guidance rather than funding levels or eligibility. The net effect is greater timing flexibility for recipients, with trade-offs between improved planning and potentially delayed on-the-ground reconstruction.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S5001)
Introduced July 31, 2025 by Alejandro Padilla · Last progress July 31, 2025
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S5001)
Introduced in Senate