This is not an official government website.
© 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Congressional Daily Record
This section captures a floor statement or debate entry. It mentions members such as John Thune.
Issued
May 20, 2026
senate side of the record
People
2
Linked members mentioned in this section
Legislation
0
No linked legislation in this section
Committees
0
No linked committees in this section
Senate Holds
0
No hold activity linked here
Source Document
Connected Data
People mentioned
Source Control
Reader mode is for comprehension. The linked government PDF is the official published source.
Download official Senate Record PDFReturn to issue contextMr. THUNE. Mr. President, yesterday on the floor I discussed some of our accomplishments here in the Senate, and one of those accomplishments is restoring regular order consideration of appropriation bills.
after the failures of the previous Democrat majority and the Biden administration to enact full-year bills in a timely manner.
open, Member-driven, and bipartisan appropriations process and passing the full compliment of 12 full-year appropriations bills. It is what I said I wanted to do when Republicans took the majority last year, and we were about to get it done—that is, until Democrats reneged on our bipartisan DHS funding bill. A bill, I might add, that included bipartisan reforms and money for additional body cameras for immigration enforcement. When they backed out of this deal, Democrats said they just needed two more weeks to negotiate additional reforms on immigration enforcement. Republicans were willing to do that, and we began negotiations.
But then that 2-week deadline came and went without much progress. And pretty soon it drug on into 40, 41, 42, 43—45 days. Instead of agreeing to fund the Department of Homeland Security while negotiations continued, Democrats shut the department down.
Meanwhile, the White House implemented reforms of its own. As negotiations continued, the White House repeatedly offered Democrats a robust package of legislative reforms. But as the weeks dragged on, it became clear the Democrats weren't interested in reforms at all. And, eventually, they just walked away.
Now why would they do that? If reforming immigration enforcement is as important as Democrats were claiming, why would Democrats choose to walk away from reforms? I suspect it is either that the reforms that the Trump administration implemented were adequate to solve the problem at hand or—and I think this is the real reason—Democrats weren't interested in reforms at all. They wanted a political issue, something that would please the far left.
winner for them because that is what we are talking about here. Democrats voted to defund border security. They voted to defund immigration enforcement—not reform, defund, and defund completely. It is really quite shameful.
Border Patrol are two agencies that “nobody respects in this country.” Nobody
respects Border Patrol and ICE; those are the Democrat leader's words.
against drug cartels and gang members doesn't merit respect from Democrats. Not only that, but Democrats apparently don't think we should have these Agencies that go after criminals, stop illegal drugs from entering our country, fight human trafficking, and enforce our Nation's immigration laws.
And that last one is, I think, the real issue here. Do Democrats believe we should enforce our immigration laws? It really seems like they don't.
sanctuary policies to prevent their law enforcement agencies from cooperating with immigration authorities. Those policies have had deadly consequences. The murder of Laken Riley is just one example. Yet Democrats still defend these misguided policies.
policies reached its zenith. The Biden administration clearly did not believe in enforcing our immigration laws, and the result was year upon year of recordbreaking illegal immigration. As even the New York Times has reported:
After Mr. Biden became president, migrant encounters at the
southern border quickly doubled, then kept rising. New
arrivals overwhelmed border stations, then border towns, and
eventually major cities like New York and Denver.
Still Democrats embrace open borders. And make no mistake, that is exactly what Democrats are embracing when they opt for giving no funding—zero funding—to Border Patrol and ICE. What they are suggesting is that we have no physical presence at our borders. They are suggesting that we don't have law enforcement officers taking criminal illegal immigrants off of our streets.
letting illegal immigrants enter our country unchecked and allowing criminal illegal immigrants to roam free is certainly not putting the American people first.
Democrats have made their choice. They would rather have applause from the far-left “defund the police” crowd than keep the American people safe. They would rather have a political issue this November than do their jobs.
As I say, they have made their choice. Fortunately, Republicans can fund these critical Agencies without Democrats' assistance. And we will be moving forward with the final steps of that process shortly.
order, bipartisan consideration of funding bills, and we were doing that. And despite Democrats' partisan games, we are still going to get the entire Federal Government funded. We are going to ensure our immigration laws are enforced and criminal illegal aliens are not allowed to live freely in our country.
security, well, they are free to do that. But Republicans are going to do our jobs and ensure that law enforcement can do theirs.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Without objection, it is so ordered.