This is not an official government website.
© 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Congressional Daily Record
This section is about changes proposed to a bill or resolution. It mentions members such as Richard Joseph Durbin.
Issued
June 24, 2026
senate side of the record
People
1
Linked members mentioned in this section
Legislation
0
No linked legislation in this section
Committees
0
No linked committees in this section
Senate Holds
0
No hold activity linked here
Source Document
Connected Data
People mentioned
Source Control
Reader mode is for comprehension. The linked government PDF is the official published source.
Download official Senate Record PDFReturn to issue contextSA 6163. Mr. DURBIN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 4784, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2027 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
At the appropriate place in subtitle G of title X, insert
the following:
SEC. __. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW OF WAR.
It is the sense of Congress, whose constitutional
responsibility it is to “define and punish . . . Offences
against the Law of Nations” and to “make Rules for the
Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces”,
that—
(1) the law of war, embodied in both treaties to which the
United States is party and customary international law, binds
the United States and the United States Armed Forces;
(2) consistent with the longstanding policy of the
Department of Defense to comply with the law of war during
all armed conflicts, the United States remains steadfastly
committed to complying with its obligations under the law of
war, including the fundamental principles of necessity,
humanity, distinction, and proportionality;
(3) in addition to being legally required, compliance with
the law of war reinforces military effectiveness, helps
maintain public support and political legitimacy, and can
encourage reciprocal adherence by the adversary or adherence
by adversaries in future conflicts;
(4) obligations under the law of war include those that
address the protection of civilians, including, among other
things—
(A) prohibitions on attacks directed at civilians and
civilian objects, indiscriminate attacks, and attacks
expected to cause excessive harm to civilians relative to the
anticipated military advantage;
(B) the requirement to take all feasible precautions to
avoid, or in any event minimize, harm to civilians; and
(C) the presumption in cases of doubt as to whether a
person is a civilian, that such person shall be considered a
civilian;
(5) the protection of civilians is fundamentally consistent
with the effective, efficient, and decisive use of force in
pursuit of United States national interests;
(6) minimizing civilian casualties can further mission
objectives, help maintain the support of partner governments
and vulnerable populations, and enhance the legitimacy and
sustainability of United States operations critical to
national security; and
(7) the United States therefore routinely imposes certain
heightened policy standards that are more protective than the
requirements of the law of war that relate to the protection
of civilians.