This is not an official government website.
© 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Congressional Daily Record
This section is about changes proposed to a bill or resolution. It mentions legislation such as Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.
Issued
September 15, 2026
senate side of the record
People
0
No members linked from this section
Legislation
1
Bills and resolutions linked from this section
Committees
0
No linked committees in this section
Senate Holds
0
No hold activity linked here
Source Document
Connected Data
Bills and resolutions
Source Control
Reader mode is for comprehension. The linked government PDF is the official published source.
Download official Senate Record PDFReturn to issue contextSA 6771. Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. Reed, Ms. Collins, Mr. Heinrich, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. King, Mr. Curtis, Ms. Smith, Mr. Cornyn, and Ms. Murkowski) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 3633, to prohibit the Federal reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
In section 10404(b)(1), strike “economically or
functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield
on an interest-bearing bank deposit” and insert
“substantially similar to the manner in which depository
institutions pay interest or yield”.
In section 10404(c)(1)(A), strike “solely”.
Amend section 10404(c)(1)(B) to read as follows:
(B) in a manner that is substantially similar to the manner
in which depository institutions pay interest or yield.
In section 10404(c)(2)(A), strike “economically or
functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield
on an interest-bearing bank deposit” and insert “made in a
manner that is substantially similar to the manner in which
depository institutions pay interest or yield”.
In section 10404(c)(2)(B), strike “that is economically or
functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield
on an interest-bearing bank deposit” and insert “in a
manner that is substantially similar to the manner in which
depository institutions pay interest or yield”.
In section 10404(c)(3)(A), in the second sentence, strike
“economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of
interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit” and
insert “made in a manner that is substantially similar to
the manner in which depository institutions pay interest or
yield”.
Strike section 10404(c)(3)(B).
In section 10404(c)(3), redesignate subparagraph (C) as
subparagraph (B).
SA 6772. Mr. HEINRICH submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 3633, to prohibit the Federal reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
At the appropriate place, insert the following:
SEC. . RULE OF CONSTRUCTION RELATING TO CERTAIN STATE AND
TRIBAL LAWS.
(a) In General.—Section 5c(c) of the Commodity Exchange
Act (7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c)) is amended by adding at the end the
following:
“(6) Applicability of federal, state, and tribal gaming
laws.—
“(A) Prohibition on listing.—Notwithstanding any other
provision of this section, no agreement, contract,
transaction, or swap relating to the outcome of, or team or
individual performance or statistics within, any sporting
event or athletic competition or any casino-style game may be
listed or made
available for clearing or trading on or through a registered
entity.
“(B) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be
construed to preempt the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25
U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), subchapter IV of chapter 53 of title
31, United States Code, section 1084 of title 18, United
States Code, or any State or Tribal law, rule, regulation,
ordinance, or resolution that regulates or prohibits any
agreement, contract, or transaction relating to any sporting
event or athletic competition or any casino-style game.”.
(b) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this Act or any
amendment made by this Act shall be construed to preempt,
repeal, limit, supersede, or otherwise affect the application
of any Federal law, including the Indian Gaming Regulatory
Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.), State law, or Tribal law
relating to gaming or gambling.