This is not an official government website.
© 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Congressional Daily Record
This section captures a floor statement or debate entry. It mentions members such as Charles Ernest Grassley.
Issued
September 29, 2026
senate side of the record
People
1
Linked members mentioned in this section
Legislation
0
No linked legislation in this section
Committees
0
No linked committees in this section
Senate Holds
0
No hold activity linked here
Source Document
Connected Data
People mentioned
Source Control
Reader mode is for comprehension. The linked government PDF is the official published source.
Download official Senate Record PDFReturn to issue contextMr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, for over a year, the Department of Defense has stopped signing wind energy mitigation agreements through its Siting Clearinghouse, which is negatively impacting energy projects in Iowa. The reason the Pentagon Office of Energy, Installations, and Environment has provided for halting mitigation agreements is that the Department is reevaluating its process, analyzing threats to national security.
put national security at risk. That said, the Department has been “reevaluating the process” for over a year. We have the most capable military and intelligence in the world. The Pentagon has the ability to identify and mitigate risks in a timelier fashion—especially given that wind energy projects are nothing new, nor are these agreements. Given the current administration's hostility to wind energy, it makes me wonder if this reevaluation is being used as an excuse to hamstring these projects.
projects pose the same concerns to national security based on the location of the project. For example, Iowa is a landlocked State. The projects underway in Iowa are not going to have the same level of national security concern as, say, a project where there are several major Active-Duty military installations, global shipping ports, and international border access points.
and have spoken directly with Secretary Hegseth about the importance of these projects for Iowa. I stressed that the mitigation agreement process must restart in a timely manner. Unfortunately, I have not been given an answer from the Pentagon on June, July, and September 2026 inquiries. This is unacceptable.
2011 National Defense Authorization Act, to evaluate and explore impacts and mitigation options related to alternative energy production to preserve military missions. Since its establishment, energy projects have been able to work with the Siting Clearinghouse to mitigate any concerns raised and agree on the most appropriate path forward.
Wind energy is extremely important in Iowa. Iowa is a top leader in wind power capacity and share of total electricity generation. Delays in new wind energy projects mean holdups in energy generation and independence, which can lower energy prices for consumers. Unfortunately, the Department of Defense does not seem to recognize the importance of timely action.
Defense Authorization Act that would put tighter timelines on the Pentagon for completing these agreements. It is important that wind energy projects can continue and that the bureaucratic redtape blocking Iowa wind projects is disposed of soon.