This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Requires the Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior to produce an annual, standardized report — included with the President’s budget — that counts and describes acres of federal land treated with hazardous fuels reduction activities. The report must count each acre only once, break down treated acres by wildland-urban interface status, wildfire risk level (start and end of the year), activity type, cost per acre, region/unit, and measured effectiveness, and must be posted publicly. Directs the agencies to adopt standardized tracking procedures within 90 days, notify Congress about those procedures within two weeks of adoption, and be reviewed by the Government Accountability Office within two years; no new funding is authorized and implementation depends on existing appropriations.
The bill increases transparency and could improve the quality and public usefulness of hazardous fuels reduction programs, but it imposes new reporting burdens without new resources and risks inconsistent data, misleading comparisons across ecosystems, and potential exposure of sensitive operational details.
Taxpayers and local communities gain greater transparency and accountability because federal land managers must annually report acres treated, costs per acre, and post reports publicly—enabling oversight and GAO review of hazardous fuels reduction programs.
Residents near treated areas (especially wildland-urban interface and rural communities) receive better information about where and how wildfire risk is being reduced, which can inform local planning and preparedness.
Federal and local land managers, utilities, and partners can improve the quality and long-term effectiveness of hazardous fuels reduction by using required tracking procedures, verification, and effectiveness analysis.
Federal employees and agencies face added administrative and data-tracking burdens because the law requires new reporting and verification but does not provide additional funding or staff.
Rural communities and local governments may receive delayed, inconsistent, or incomplete reports if agencies lack resources, reducing the usefulness of the information for local planning and oversight.
Cost-per-acre and effectiveness metrics may be difficult to standardize across diverse ecosystems, creating a risk of misleading comparisons that could distort funding or management choices.
Introduced January 3, 2025 by Thomas P. TIFFANY · Last progress March 4, 2026