Sponsors
The bill directs a DOE-led federal assessment to improve understanding, oversight, and potential protections for geoengineering risks, but it may leave privately funded projects unassessed, create interagency overlap, and incur modest federal costs.
Communities near potential geoengineering activities (including urban and rural communities) would receive better protections if the federal assessment identifies harms and mitigation needs.
Researchers, policymakers, and state governments will get a federal assessment of health and environmental risks from geoengineering, giving evidence to inform safer decisions and policy.
Federal, state, and local agencies will have improved coordination and transparency over federally funded geoengineering activities, supporting oversight of government-supported projects.
Local communities and local governments could remain exposed to unassessed risks because the study only covers geoengineering with federal funding or participation and may exclude privately funded projects.
Federal employees and state governments could face duplicated or overlapping responsibilities because the Secretary of Energy leads the effort, risking inefficiencies with other agencies (e.g., EPA, NOAA).
Taxpayers may incur additional federal costs because DOE staff time and possible contractor funds will be used for the study, with no immediate changes to projects guaranteed.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Requires the Secretary of Energy to study and report on human health and environmental harms from federally funded or participated geoengineering projects, with start and reporting deadlines and definitions.
Introduced January 6, 2026 by Eli Crane · Last progress January 6, 2026
Requires the Secretary of Energy to study and report on the negative human health and environmental effects of geoengineering projects that involve federal funding or federal participation. The study must begin within 180 days of enactment, be done in coordination with relevant federal or state agencies, and lead to a report to Congress issued no later than one year after the study concludes. Defines key terms for the study: what counts as a “covered geoengineering project” and what technologies qualify as “geoengineering” (including sulfate or metal-based aerosol injection and marine cloud brightening), and specifies that “Secretary” means the Secretary of Energy.