Sponsors (4)
The bill centralizes Commerce oversight and mandates reporting to better identify and block foreign‑adversary risks to vehicle and critical‑technology supply chains—boosting national security and policy visibility—while imposing potentially broad compliance costs, market restrictions, and uncertainty for manufacturers and investors.
Manufacturers, workers, and the public: clearer definitions plus reporting and Commerce authority let the Department of Commerce identify, report, and block foreign‑adversary involvement in vehicle supply chains and tech partnerships, helping protect U.S. IP and national security.
U.S. economy and policymakers: the bill targets critical and emerging technologies (AI, semiconductors, PNT, etc.) and requires study/reporting, increasing visibility into supply‑chain vulnerabilities and informing policy to protect economic competitiveness.
Manufacturers, Congress, and the public: centralizing responsibility at the Secretary of Commerce and producing an unclassified report improves federal accountability, creates a single point of contact for enforcement, and increases transparency (subject to CBI/classified exclusions).
Manufacturers, suppliers, and consumers: broad/overlapping definitions of covered hardware/software (tied to primary vehicle processors and RF bands) plus expansive foreign‑adversary restrictions could sweep in common components, raise compliance costs, force divestments or restrict market access, and ultimately raise prices or reduce choice.
Manufacturers and developers of lower‑level or hybrid autonomy: limiting 'automated driving system' to SAE Level 3–5 risks leaving lower‑level systems or mixed architectures outside the rule, creating regulatory gaps and uncertainty for many developers.
Companies and investors: mandatory public reporting and subsequent scrutiny could expose competitively sensitive information (if not exempted) and trigger increased regulatory action, raising compliance costs and investment uncertainty.
Based on analysis of 3 sections of legislative text.
Requires Commerce to study and report on U.S. automakers' ownership, investments, technology transfers, and operations tied to foreign adversaries and assess related national-security and economic risks.
Official title: To require the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study on the national and economic security risks posed by foreign adversaries to the automotive industry of the United States, and for other purposes.
Introduced August 27, 2026 by Diana Harshbarger · Last progress August 27, 2026
Requires the Secretary of Commerce to study and report on U.S. passenger vehicle manufacturers’ relationships and transactions with entities that are "foreign adversaries," focusing on hardware, software, investments, and operations that could present national security, economic competitiveness, or intellectual property risks. The Department must consult other agencies and publish an unclassified report (excluding trade secrets or classified information) on findings within two years of enactment. The law defines key terms for the study — including what counts as covered hardware and software, which technologies are "critical and emerging," who is a foreign adversary, and which congressional committees receive the report — and directs Commerce to assess technology transfers, ownership or control, state-directed investment links, and foreign-located operations or employees for each covered manufacturer.