Sponsors (3)
The resolution highlights and supports science-based fisheries management and Indigenous roles—benefiting consumers, coastal communities, and tribes—while providing no new funding and leaving open the possibility of regulatory limits that could harm some fishermen's short-term incomes.
Consumers and the seafood industry benefit from the resolution's emphasis on abundant fish stocks, which supports the Nation's food supply and broader economy.
NOAA and coastal communities benefit from the reaffirmed support for science-based fisheries management, which has helped rebuild dozens of fish stocks and reduced bycatch.
Fishermen and Tribal communities benefit from formal recognition of Indigenous stewardship and council roles in fisheries decisionmaking, supporting local access and cultural fishing practices.
Coastal communities receive no new funding or immediate remedies because the resolution largely restates existing statutes without creating operative programs or assistance.
Fishermen may face short-term income losses because the resolution's language could be used to justify regulatory actions that limit certain fishing practices.
Based on analysis of 1 section of legislative text.
Makes a formal statement recognizing the Magnuson‑Stevens Act, fisheries conservation achievements, and Indigenous stewardship but makes no legal or funding changes.
Introduced April 16, 2026 by Jared Huffman · Last progress April 16, 2026
Expresses congressional findings that highlight the importance of abundant marine fish stocks, Indigenous stewardship, and the history and goals of the Magnuson‑Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The text summarizes the Act’s reach (200 nautical miles), regional council structure including Tribal participation, science‑based management, and cited conservation outcomes, but it contains no legal changes, funding, or enforceable commands.