Sponsors
The bill increases CFPB transparency and periodic scrutiny of rules and lowers some regulatory burdens on financial firms, but at the cost of shifting priorities and adding procedures that could weaken consumer protections, slow enforcement, and bias rulemaking toward short‑term cost/access metrics.
Consumers (especially uninsured, low-income, and middle-class households) and other stakeholders gain clearer explanations and public metrics for new CFPB rules, improving transparency and accountability about how rules affect access and cost of financial products.
Businesses and consumers may benefit from mandated periodic (1-,2-,5-,10-year) reviews that identify ineffective or outdated rules, potentially reducing unnecessary compliance costs for firms and lowering prices or expanding choices for consumers.
Financial institutions face reduced regulatory priorities around market fairness, lowering their compliance burdens and regulatory costs.
Consumers (including low- and middle-income households) face higher risk of abusive, opaque, discriminatory, or predatory financial practices if the CFPB deprioritizes fairness and transparency enforcement.
Overall CFPB enforcement and oversight capacity could be reduced—both by shifting the Bureau's mandate away from certain fairness-focused priorities and by increased administrative burdens—weakening oversight of some financial firms.
Mandatory metrics focused on access and cost may bias rule design toward short-term price effects and away from non-quantifiable protections such as fair lending and consumer privacy, harming vulnerable groups.
Based on analysis of 3 sections of legislative text.
Introduced March 18, 2025 by Thomas Earl Emmer · Last progress March 18, 2025
Amends the Consumer Financial Protection Act to refocus the Bureau’s stated purpose toward strengthening private-sector participation in consumer finance markets and creates a new Office of Economic Analysis inside the Bureau to review, measure, and publish economic assessments of proposed and existing rules, guidance, orders, and regulations. The Director must consider those reviews before issuing actions, explain any disagreement, and include measurable metrics (including effects on consumer access and cost) in proposed rulemakings, plus periodic 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year evaluations of regulatory outcomes.