Sponsors (4)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced September 17, 2025 by Debra Fischer · Last progress September 17, 2025
Makes many changes to the federal child care block grant law to expand who is eligible, tighten planning and reporting rules for states, require states to use cost‑estimation models for payment rates, set aside funding for workforce supports, and authorize funding as needed for fiscal years 2026–2030. It also requires the Agriculture Department to exempt state‑licensed child care businesses from a specified rural‑development regulation. Adds new definitions and program language to promote a mixed delivery child care system (centers, family child care, Head Start, schools, faith‑based providers), changes income and asset eligibility rules, creates a process for states to raise income eligibility with new documentation, and requires additional state reporting and benchmarks on affordability, access, workforce, quality, and program integrity.
The bill would expand and better-target subsidized child care, workforce supports, and state flexibility—potentially improving access and quality for many families—but it raises costs, administrative burdens, and risks uneven state implementation that could limit benefits for the poorest children unless funding and oversight keep pace.
Low-income families and children: expand eligibility and access to subsidized child care (explicit eligibility for children under 13 up to 85% SMI, inclusion of treatment/leave activities, priority populations, and waiver pathways), increasing who can receive assistance and the types of activities covered.
Parents, families, and program users: enable more reliable/greater funding flexibility by allowing Congress to appropriate necessary CCDBG funds annually and by creating clearer funding pathways (including a workforce set-aside), supporting program continuity and potential scale-up.
Child care workers and children: require dedicated workforce investments (minimum set-aside and supports for recruitment, training, retention), which should improve staff qualifications, reduce turnover, and raise program quality.
Taxpayers and federal budget stakeholders: open-ended appropriations, new set-asides, and broader eligibility/waivers can substantially increase federal and state child care spending, raising taxpayer costs and fiscal exposure.
State and local administrators, and providers: numerous new requirements (cost models, sliding fee scales, consultation, reports, waiver documentation, workforce set-aside) create significant administrative and compliance burdens that could divert time and funds from direct services.
Children and families: uneven state implementation, variable licensing standards, mixed delivery expansion, and broader parental choice risk inconsistent quality and oversight across providers and states, producing patchy service quality for families.