Sponsors (6)
The section proposes potential local conservation centers but lacks funding and basic program details, leaving benefits uncertain and exposing participants and taxpayers to implementation and governance risks.
No clear, immediate benefits are established in the text because the section contains no funding, definitions, or implementation details.
Rural communities and taxpayers: the section envisions local centers that might create jobs or conservation work but includes no appropriation, cost estimate, or implementation funding, so local benefits are speculative while taxpayers could face future costs if the program is later implemented.
Nonprofits, young adults, and land managers: the section provides no definitions, eligibility criteria, or program safeguards, so potential participants and partner organizations cannot rely on clear rules, protections, or consistent administration.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Directs an amendment to add 'Civilian Conservation Centers' to public lands law but includes no substantive program text, funding, or implementation details.
Introduced May 15, 2025 by Jeff Merkley · Last progress May 15, 2025
Adds a short title and instructs an amendment to the public lands law to create “Civilian Conservation Centers,” but includes no substantive program language, definitions, funding, or implementation details. Because the bill contains only a citation and an amendment instruction with no operative text, it does not by itself create programs, appropriations, or regulatory requirements.