Need help making sense of this bill?
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Requires USDA conservation practice standards to consider and evaluate climate benefits when they are written or updated. It adds a clear definition of “climate benefit,” covering activities that cut farm greenhouse gas emissions, increase carbon storage in soils and plants, and help farms adapt to or reduce harm from more volatile weather. This is a targeted policy change to the conservation standards used across Farm Bill programs. It does not create new programs or funding, but it guides how practices are assessed so that climate outcomes are part of the criteria used by USDA and conservation planners.
In 16 U.S.C. 3842(h)(1)(A) replace the phrase "1 year after the date of enactment of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018" with "Climate Agricultural Conservation Practices Act".
In 16 U.S.C. 3842(h)(1)(C) strike the existing text of subparagraph (C) and insert a semicolon.
In 16 U.S.C. 3842(h)(1)(D) strike the period at the end of subparagraph (D) and replace it with "; and" to continue the list.
Add new subparagraph (E) to 16 U.S.C. 3842(h)(1) requiring that the standards evaluate the climate benefits of the standards.
In 16 U.S.C. 3842(h)(3)(B) insert the phrase "climate benefits, " so the list reads "climate benefits, conservation innovations, and ..." replacing the prior wording that began with "conservation innovations and".
Primary effects fall on USDA (NRCS) staff who write, review, and update conservation practice standards, who must now include climate benefits in their evaluations. Farmers, ranchers, and other producers interacting with USDA conservation programs may see standards and guidance that more clearly highlight practices with measurable climate outcomes (e.g., reduced emissions, increased carbon sequestration, resilience to extreme weather). Technical service providers and conservation planners will align planning tools and recommendations with the updated standards. The change is procedural rather than a direct mandate on producers; costs are mainly administrative for USDA to document and assess climate benefits. Potential benefits include better long‑term farm resilience and clearer criteria for prioritizing practices with strong climate outcomes.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Introduced March 5, 2025 by Julia Brownley · Last progress March 5, 2025
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Introduced in House