Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Amends the Federal Trade Commission Act's definition of the term “Corporation” by making two textual edits: replacing the phrase ", and any" with ", any," and directing the insertion of additional text immediately before the final period (the inserted text is not shown in the excerpt). The change is phrased as a textual amendment to the existing statutory definition rather than as a new program, funding, or enforcement mechanism. This is a narrowly focused, technical amendment. Its practical effects depend on the content of the text being inserted (not provided here); as written it appears to be an editorial change that could nonetheless affect how the FTC’s jurisdiction or coverage language is parsed and applied in litigation or rulemaking. No funding or effective date is specified in the provided text.
Amend Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 44) by striking the phrase ", and any" and inserting the phrase ", any" in the undesignated paragraph that defines the term "Corporation."
Amend the same undesignated paragraph by inserting before the period at the end the following: . (In this excerpt the text to be inserted is not shown or is blank.)
Last progress April 24, 2025 (10 months ago)
Introduced on April 24, 2025 by Victoria Spartz
Primary affected parties:
Businesses and organizations defined or potentially defined as "Corporation" under the FTC Act: The amendment directly changes the statutory wording that defines "Corporation," so entities that fall (or might fall) within that definition are the most directly affected. Depending on the unspecified inserted text, more entities could be added or removed from that definition.
Federal Trade Commission staff and legal counsel: The FTC will need to account for the revised statutory language when interpreting its jurisdiction, drafting guidance, pursuing investigations, or enforcing the Act. If the insertion changes scope, the agency may need to update internal policies or enforcement priorities.
Courts and lawyers: Any change in statutory wording can produce litigation over interpretation. Parties challenging FTC actions or defending against enforcement may raise new legal arguments tied to the amended definition.
Consumers and the public: Effects are indirect. If the definition narrows FTC coverage, some businesses might escape certain FTC oversight; if it expands coverage, more businesses could be subject to FTC rules or enforcement. The net consumer impact depends on the substance of the inserted text.
Overall effect: