Sponsors (9)
Replacing a vague statutory term with a specific number ('15') increases clarity and predictability for banks and regulators but may shift compliance burdens for some banks and create short‑term uncertainty if the final insertion is not promptly published.
Banks and the Federal Reserve: replacing a vague statutory term with a specific numeric limit ('15') makes statutory limits clearer and more predictable for banks' planning and Fed enforcement.
Regulators and supervisors: specifying a numeric value reduces legal and enforcement ambiguity, making regulatory decision‑making and compliance oversight clearer.
Banks (especially mid‑sized or borderline institutions): the new numeric limit could tighten or relax existing thresholds, causing increased compliance costs or operational impacts for some institutions.
Financial institutions and state regulators: if the bill is enacted without the final inserted text published, temporary uncertainty about the exact wording will complicate compliance planning and enforcement.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Edits wording in two federal banking statutes: replaces a term with "15" in one provision and attempts a replacement in another provision that is blank in the excerpt.
Introduced November 4, 2025 by Michael Lawler · Last progress November 4, 2025
Makes two short changes to federal banking law text and sets a short title for the Act. One change replaces a term in an older statute with the number "15," and the other change attempts to replace a term in a Federal Reserve Act sentence but the replacement text is blank in the provided text. These edits do not create new programs, change funding, or add regulatory duties; they are direct textual amendments to existing statute language. The blank insertion in one amendment could create ambiguity and may require later correction or clarification.