Sponsors (4)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates a coordinated federal effort to speed development, demonstration, and commercial use of low‑emissions cement, concrete, asphalt binder, and asphalt mixtures. The Department of Energy must stand up an R&D-to-commercialization program, set baselines and reduction timelines, run a demonstration initiative with $200 million authorized for FY2025–2029, and lead an interagency Task Force. Commerce (through NIST) is directed to support or create two Manufacturing USA institutes for testing, data, standards, and workforce training. The Federal Highway Administration will run a program to reimburse incremental costs and provide a 2% incentive for using approved low‑emissions materials on State highway projects (with $15 million authorized for FY2025–2027). The bill also allows States to use Federal‑aid funds for advance multiyear purchases of innovative, domestically produced low‑emissions materials under new procurement rules and creates reporting, coordination, and technical assistance requirements across agencies and stakeholders.
This bill accelerates adoption of lower‑carbon cement, concrete, and asphalt through grants, standards, procurement incentives, and technical assistance—delivering climate, health, and workforce benefits—while raising short‑term costs, compliance burdens, and risks to small or regional suppliers amid limited dedicated funding and administrative uncertainty.
Local communities, taxpayers, and road users will see lower embodied greenhouse‑gas emissions and improved air quality as infrastructure increasingly uses low‑emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt.
Construction and materials firms, and state/local governments, gain access to DOE‑funded R&D, demonstration grants, regional centers, and technical assistance that can help scale low‑emissions technologies and accelerate adoption.
Construction workers and manufacturers receive training and upskilling programs to support domestic production of low‑emissions materials, improving workforce readiness and job opportunities.
Taxpayers, state and local governments, and contractors may face higher short‑term material and project costs and increased federal spending to support incentives and reimbursements.
Small producers and contractors will incur additional compliance, certification, testing, and reporting costs (EPDs, lifecycle assessments), which can be a significant burden for firms with limited capital.
Regional and smaller suppliers — especially in rural areas — risk being disadvantaged by baseline comparisons, matching‑fund priorities, demonstration siting, and demonstration/logistics requirements, reducing supplier diversity and local economic activity.
Introduced March 13, 2025 by Christopher A. Coons · Last progress March 13, 2025