The bill could strengthen energy resilience and lower fuel costs for consumers and the military by encouraging domestic oil production, but it risks worsening local pollution, public-health impacts, and slowing the transition to cleaner energy.
Taxpayers, military personnel, and government contractors could face lower supply-risk and fiscal pressure because increased domestic oil availability would reduce reliance on imported oil and improve energy resilience.
Middle-class families and small-business owners could see lower fuel and transport costs if the bill's findings prompt policies that expand domestic oil supply or lower fuel prices.
Rural communities and taxpayers could face higher local pollution and slowed national greenhouse‑gas reduction if the bill leads to policies prioritizing expanded domestic oil production over clean-energy investments.
Communities near production or refining sites could experience worsened health and land‑use impacts (and associated costs) if the bill encourages increased domestic oil activity.
Based on analysis of 1 section of legislative text.
Records findings that state policies limiting fuel supply raise prices, reduce domestic production/refining, increase import reliance, and pose national security risks.
Introduced April 29, 2026 by Ken Calvert · Last progress April 29, 2026
States findings that affordable, reliable energy is essential for households, businesses, and national security and asserts that some state-level policies that limit fuel supply raise gasoline prices. It says higher fuel costs hit working-class families hardest, increase costs for military operations and personnel, and deepen reliance on oil imports, which the text describes as a national security risk. The text also asserts that U.S. oil production, especially Gulf of Mexico output, has lower greenhouse gas intensity than many foreign sources and warns that widespread adoption of restrictive energy policies would raise prices, reduce domestic production and refining, and weaken readiness and security.