The resolution strengthens protections and legal clarity for houses of worship against disruptive actions, but risks chilling speech (including protest and journalism) and could increase policing burdens on local governments.
Worshipers at local congregations (including Cities Church) are affirmed protection from intimidation and disruptions, giving congregants greater assurance to practice their faith without interference.
Clarifies that entering a church to disrupt worship is not protected speech, supporting federal prosecutions and civil remedies against those who unlawfully interrupt services.
Condemning high-profile participation in disruptions may deter influencers from legitimizing unlawful acts and reduce threats to congregant safety.
Emphasizing criminal enforcement for disruptions may blur lines between protected protest and unlawful conduct, chilling peaceful demonstrators near houses of worship.
Urging heightened enforcement could lead to increased policing at religious sites, imposing costs on local governments and taxpayers and possibly escalating confrontations.
Publicly singling out a named media figure risks chilling lawful journalistic activity and could be perceived as punitive without due process.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Expresses condemnation of the forcible disruption of a St. Paul worship service, affirms First Amendment protection for religious exercise, and cites the FACE Act against obstructing worship.
Introduced January 30, 2026 by Buddy Carter · Last progress January 30, 2026
Condemns a forcible disruption of a worship service at Cities Church in St. Paul on January 18, 2026, describing protesters who entered the sanctuary, shouted over clergy, and intimidated worshipers including families and children. Affirms that the First Amendment protects religious exercise, cites the FACE Act (18 U.S.C. § 248) as prohibiting force, threats, or physical obstruction of people exercising religious beliefs, and states that entering a church to disrupt worship is not protected speech while peaceful protest is protected.