Want the short version? I can break this bill down for you
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Sets the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s available funding to no more than $0 and removes two existing funding paragraphs, effectively revoking the Bureau’s independent funding authority under current law. It also renumbers two remaining funding provisions to reflect the deletions.
Amend paragraph (1) of 12 U.S.C. 5497(a) by replacing the existing text beginning with "taking into account" through the period at the end with the clause "which shall be not more than $0." This sets a maximum funding amount of $0 for the provision governed by paragraph (1).
Strike paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 1017(a) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5497(a)), removing those paragraphs from the statute.
Redesignate paragraphs (4) and (5) of Section 1017(a) (12 U.S.C. 5497(a)) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.
Who is affected and how
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB): The agency’s statutory funding authority under the amended provision is set to $0, which would directly limit its ability to draw funds under that law. Without other funding provided by Congress or other legal authorities, the CFPB could be forced to curtail operations, enforcement actions, supervision, rulemaking, and consumer outreach.
Financial institutions and firms (banks, credit unions, mortgage servicers, nonbank lenders, fintechs): Companies currently supervised or regulated by the CFPB could see reduced federal oversight and enforcement activity if the Bureau’s operations are limited. That could change compliance costs and enforcement risk profiles for these firms.
Consumers (borrowers, credit-card users, mortgage and loan customers): Reduced CFPB capacity could weaken federal consumer protections, complaint handling, and enforcement of unfair or deceptive practices, affecting consumers’ ability to seek redress and protection.
Federal budgeting and other agencies: Shifts in funding authority may require appropriators or other agencies to act to fill gaps. Some CFPB responsibilities might be shifted to other federal agencies or left unfilled, producing gaps in oversight.
Congress and courts: The change could prompt legislative follow-up (to restore funding or reassign responsibilities) and legal challenges about the statutory and constitutional implications of limiting agency funding in this manner.
Secondary effects
Overall effect
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Introduced January 29, 2025 by Rafael Edward Cruz · Last progress January 29, 2025
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Defund the CFPB Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Introduced in Senate