Sponsors (10)
The resolution offers political reassurance to those who oppose Sharia influencing U.S. law, but at the cost of stigmatizing and politicizing treatment of Muslim communities, risking discrimination, erosion of religious freedoms, and harms to social cohesion.
Constituents worried about preserving a secular, Constitution-based legal order (including some voters and policymakers) would get a clear congressional statement rejecting Sharia’s compatibility with U.S. law, providing symbolic reassurance and a policy signal to those communities.
Muslim individuals and communities (including religious organizations and immigrants) would face increased stigma, surveillance, discrimination, and potential limits on religious expression or association as the resolution portrays Sharia as incompatible with U.S. law.
Federal decision-making, enforcement, and immigration actions could become politicized—officials might use the resolution’s findings to justify differential treatment of Muslim people or to link contemporary actors to those claims.
Racial and immigrant communities (particularly Muslims) could face increased xenophobia and weakened social cohesion if the resolution endorses historical claims about conquest and forced conversion.
Based on analysis of 1 section of legislative text.
Expresses a nonbinding congressional view that Sharia is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and reaffirms constitutional supremacy.
Official title: Denouncing Sharia law in the United States.
Introduced September 3, 2026 by Keith Self · Last progress September 3, 2026
Declares that the U.S. Constitution and federal law are supreme and states that any legal or political system claiming authority above the Constitution threatens national unity. Asserts that Sharia (Islamic jurisprudence) functions as a comprehensive political and legal order that, in the drafters' view, is incompatible with U.S. constitutional values and individual rights, citing alleged effects on women, dissidents, and non‑Muslims. The resolution is a nonbinding, formal statement of opinion and does not create or change criminal law, civil law, or federal programs. It expresses findings and conclusions about Sharia and constitutional primacy rather than directing executive action or allocating funds.