The bill makes it easier for authorities and the public to identify and remove individuals with final removal orders by publicly listing identifying details, but it raises significant privacy, safety, misidentification, and taxpayer-cost risks for immigrants and their communities.
Law enforcement, federal immigration authorities, and state/local officials can more easily identify, locate, and remove people with final removal orders because DHS will publish names, photos, aliases, and last-known State in a centralized public list.
Taxpayers and the public gain increased transparency and awareness of immigration enforcement outcomes through publication of final removal orders and identifying information.
People subject to final removal orders — and others who share names or resemble published photos — face heightened privacy risks, doxxing, threats, and wrongful targeting due to public posting of personal identifying information.
Publishing last-known State information can endanger community members and families by revealing where individuals reside or are associated, creating safety and potential retaliation risks.
Maintaining and publishing a public list imposes administrative costs on DHS that are ultimately borne by taxpayers.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Requires DHS to publish the name, photo, aliases, and last known U.S. state of residence for each person issued a final order of removal after enactment.
Introduced October 21, 2025 by Andrew S. Biggs · Last progress October 21, 2025
Requires the Department of Homeland Security to publish on its website the name of every person who receives a final order of removal after the law takes effect, and for each such person to also publish a photograph, any known aliases, and the person’s last known U.S. state of residence. It also makes a technical renumbering change to the immigration court statute. The change directs DHS to make this information public, which affects people subject to final removal orders, DHS operations that must collect and post the data, and groups concerned with privacy, safety, and accuracy. The mandate is straightforward but raises potential privacy, safety, and legal questions and will create an ongoing administrative requirement for DHS.