Sponsors (2)
The resolution promotes bird‑friendly planning that can improve public safety, recreation, and ecosystem services, but it provides no funding to guarantee implementation and could lead some local design rules that raise development costs.
About 100 million nature-based recreation participants (and the nonprofits and communities that serve them) could see stronger support for birdwatching infrastructure and programs, helping sustain related economic activity.
Urban and suburban residents will experience reduced bird collisions and less nighttime light pollution from encouraged bird-friendly planning, improving neighborhood safety and nighttime comfort.
Farmers, gardeners, and homeowners may benefit from stronger habitat conservation that bolsters ecosystem services such as pollination, pest control, and seed dispersal.
Nonprofits, state and local governments, and other stakeholders may be disappointed because the resolution signals priorities but creates no new funding or binding requirements to ensure action.
Construction projects, builders, and some homeowners could face higher design or compliance costs if jurisdictions adopt bird‑friendly planning or lighting standards prompted by the resolution.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Expresses findings that migratory birds are important, notes threats and population declines, and supports education and World Migratory Bird Day; it does not change law or funding.
Introduced May 8, 2025 by Martin Heinrich · Last progress May 8, 2025
Recognizes migratory birds as ecologically and economically important, lists major threats to their populations (habitat loss, drought, invasive species, light pollution, collisions, urban expansion), and emphasizes public education and the observance of World Migratory Bird Day. It cites the North American Wetlands Conservation Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as foundational authorities supporting wetland conservation and migratory bird protection. The measure is a nonbinding statement of findings and policy intent; it does not create legal obligations, change statutes, or provide funding. It is primarily symbolic and aims to raise awareness and encourage conservation actions through education and existing authorities.