This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced October 30, 2025 by Joni Ernst · Last progress October 30, 2025
Directs the General Services Administration (GSA) to dispose of six named federal buildings in Washington, D.C., by sale at fair market value or by ground lease up to 99 years, and allows GSA to relocate agencies, include short leasebacks, and add up to 20 additional low‑utilization GSA buildings per year. The law mostly exempts those disposals from certain environmental, historic preservation, homeless assistance, procurement, and judicial-review laws, bars sales or ground leases to foreign persons/entities, requires limited notice to congressional committees before public relocation announcements, and directs net proceeds to the Federal Buildings Fund for relocation costs (with excess to the Treasury general fund). The disposal authority expires on December 31, 2028.
The bill speeds disposal and redevelopment of high-value federal buildings in DC and provides implementation funding and operational flexibility for agencies, but it does so by limiting environmental review, judicial oversight, buyer eligibility, and some procurement safeguards—trading public oversight and broader market participation for speed and control.
Federal agencies and employees: The bill authorizes relocation of agencies and permits up to five-year leasebacks so agencies can continue operating during transitions.
GSA / Federal Buildings Fund: Proceeds from disposals can be directed into the Federal Buildings Fund to pay relocation and implementation costs, reducing the need for new appropriations for those moves.
Taxpayers: Net sale proceeds beyond relocation and implementation costs may be deposited into the Treasury general fund, which could modestly reduce the federal deficit.
Local governments, taxpayers, and other affected parties: The bill precludes judicial review (including under the APA and Tucker Act) of disposals and relocation decisions, removing an important avenue for legal challenge and oversight.
Local and urban communities: Exemptions from NEPA and historic‑preservation laws allow redevelopment and disposal decisions to proceed without environmental review or community input, increasing the risk of harmful or insensitive projects.
Federal employees and mission delivery: Agencies may be relocated without agency control over site selection, potentially disrupting employee commutes, retention, and the agencies' ability to deliver services.