Sponsors (2)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Introduced March 24, 2026 by John A. Barrasso · Last progress March 24, 2026
Requires the Treasury to warn Congress at least 60 days before the United States would hit the statutory debt limit even after using extraordinary measures, and forces any formal presidential request to raise the debt limit to include proposed legislation that cuts spending by at least the same amount over the current and next 10 years. Adds enforceable congressional points of order that bar consideration of measures to increase or suspend the debt limit unless equal or greater 10-year net spending reductions are specified, with procedural rules for cost estimates and waiver thresholds.
The bill increases fiscal transparency and forces tighter, 10-year offsets for debt-limit increases—potentially lowering long-term borrowing—but does so at the cost of greater risk that required offsets and procedural hurdles will produce painful program cuts or delayed action that could threaten markets and public services.
Taxpayers and lawmakers will get clearer advance notice (when the government is within 60 days of the debt limit), enabling more timely congressional action to try to avoid payment disruptions.
Taxpayers and middle-class families will face stronger fiscal discipline because presidential requests to raise the debt limit must be matched by equal-dollar, 10-year non-interest spending offsets and the bill limits off-budget or timing "gimmicks," making deficit impacts more transparent and potentially lowering long-term federal borrowing.
Taxpayers and lawmakers will benefit from improved transparency because CBO estimates for debt-limit measures must be posted at least 24 hours before a vote, giving voters and members more information ahead of decisions.
Federal employees, families, and middle-class households could face steep or immediate cuts because requiring equal-dollar, 10-year offsets to raise the debt limit may force reductions to programs and services those groups rely on.
Taxpayers and program beneficiaries may see more severe program cuts or tax increases because the law bars counting net interest savings toward offsets, making it harder to meet required reductions without cutting benefits or raising revenue.
Taxpayers, state governments, and markets face a higher risk of fiscal standoffs and delayed or missed debt-limit actions—because of mandated offsets and procedural hurdles—which could increase the chance of default or credit-market disruption with broad economic harm.