Sponsors (13)
The bill reduces federal protections and cross-border considerations for Mexican wolves to ease local impacts and sharpen U.S.-focused ESA decisions, but it raises the risk of species decline, weakens coordinated recovery efforts, and may create taxpayer liabilities.
Ranchers and farmers near the Mexican Wolf Experimental Population Area will likely experience fewer livestock losses and lower depredation-related costs because federal protections for Mexican wolves are removed.
State and local governments and stakeholders will have clearer, more U.S.-focused ESA decision-making because the bill limits consideration of a species' recovery status in other countries.
Local residents in affected rural areas may experience improved perceived public safety and expanded recreational access if Mexican wolf presence is reduced.
Wild Mexican wolf populations and the ecosystems they inhabit face higher risks of population decline and loss of genetic diversity because delisting allows increased lethal removal and removes federal conservation safeguards.
Conservation programs and captive-breeding efforts may lose access to federal recovery funding and coordinated management, reducing long-term recovery prospects for the species.
Researchers, managers, and recovery planners will be hampered by a prohibition on considering Mexican recovery status in Mexico, limiting scientific context and cross-border recovery strategies.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Introduced June 30, 2025 by Paul Gosar · Last progress June 30, 2025
Removes the Mexican wolf from the Endangered Species Act and voids two prior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rules related to that wolf. It also bars the Interior Secretary (via the USFWS Director) from considering the species’ status or recovery in Mexico when preparing recovery plans or making future listing or status-change decisions if the wolf is ever relisted.