Sponsors (3)
Want the short version? I can break this bill down for you
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Removes the rule that a lawful permanent resident who is the spouse of an active‑duty member of the U.S. Armed Forces must have lived in the State or Service district where they file their application for at least three months. The change lets eligible military spouses file without meeting that three‑month local residency requirement. The change is narrow and administrative: it affects filing eligibility for a specific group of lawful permanent residents (spouses of service members on active duty in the United States) and requires agencies to update guidance and processing practices but creates no new spending or tax changes.
Adds a new subsection (f) to Section 319 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to create a special rule for certain spouses of Armed Forces members.
States that, for a lawful permanent resident who is the spouse of an Armed Forces member on active duty in the United States, the requirement under subsection (a) of Section 319 and under section 316(a) that the applicant have resided within the State or Service district where they filed their application for at least three months does not apply.
Who is affected and how:
Lawful permanent residents who are spouses of active‑duty service members: Directly benefits them by removing a short‑term residency obstacle when filing the specified application; they can file immediately after arrival or relocation rather than waiting three months.
Active‑duty service members and military families: Experience reduced administrative delay and uncertainty related to spouse filings, easing family planning and access to immigration processes while stationed domestically.
U.S. immigration authorities (e.g., USCIS and adjudicators): Must update intake procedures, eligibility checklists, training materials, and guidance to stop enforcing the three‑month State/Service‑district residency requirement for this group; operational impact is expected to be modest and administrative in nature.
State and local governments: Little to no direct impact; the change affects federal filing eligibility, not state benefits or residency rules.
Overall effect: The legislation is a narrowly targeted, low‑cost administrative relief measure that reduces a filing barrier for a defined group of military spouses. It should slightly increase timely filings by that group and requires modest procedural updates by federal immigration processors.
Expand sections to see detailed analysis
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced May 13, 2025 by Marilyn Strickland · Last progress May 13, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House