Sponsors
The bill speeds law enforcement access and creates an individual private right to sue for noncompliance, but does so by imposing faster deadlines and broader litigation exposure on large providers that raise costs and may constrain providers' ability to challenge warrants.
Law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and federal courts get faster, clearer access to communications and records because large providers must comply with warrants within 72 hours, reducing uncertainty and speeding serious investigations and case handling.
Individuals can sue a large provider that fails to comply with a warrant, giving injured people a private right to seek damages and injunctions.
Large tech providers face greater litigation exposure because the private right of action applies "notwithstanding any other provision," potentially overriding statutory limits and increasing liability and chilling effects on services.
Large providers will incur higher operational and compliance costs to meet the 72-hour production requirement, raising expenses for tech firms and potentially downstream costs for consumers or customers.
Providers have a short 48-hour window to file a motion to contest a warrant, which may limit their ability to seek timely judicial relief and force rushed legal responses.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Requires very large electronic communication and remote computing providers (those with at least 1,000,000 users) to comply with warrants or court orders for the contents of communications or related records within 72 hours, with courts permitted to grant case-by-case extensions for complex or voluminous requests. It also shortens the time those providers have to file a motion to challenge a disclosure order to 48 hours and creates a private federal right for people harmed by a provider's failure to comply to seek injunctive relief and monetary damages.
Introduced February 9, 2026 by Brittany Pettersen · Last progress February 9, 2026