Sponsors (2)
The resolution strengthens the case for coordinated enforcement to recover revenue and curb illicit trade, at the trade‑off of higher compliance costs, potential delays for legitimate imports, and increased privacy and due‑process concerns.
Taxpayers could see more government revenue recovered because the resolution highlights billions lost to trade fraud and recent large-duty evasion cases, strengthening the case for recovery actions.
Federal law enforcement (e.g., DOJ, DHS) gains stronger justification for coordinated, cross‑agency enforcement efforts and task forces to target illicit trade.
Consumers and legitimate small businesses could face fewer counterfeit goods and benefit from safer supply chains if the resolution spurs public‑private partnerships and education to reduce illicit trade.
Businesses and consumers could face higher costs and slower shipments because stronger enforcement at ports and borders may increase inspections, compliance burdens, and delays.
Expanded enforcement and greater information‑sharing could raise privacy and due‑process risks for individuals and companies subject to investigations.
Language emphasizing an 'America First' trade approach could steer enforcement toward protectionist priorities, risking trade frictions and diplomatic costs that harm exporters and consumers.
Based on analysis of 1 section of legislative text.
Finds and highlights the harms of illicit trade, urges public-private partnerships, education, and research; does not create new legal obligations or funding.
Expresses congressional findings about the size, scope, and harms of illicit trade and trade fraud worldwide and in the U.S., citing government and international reports and a recent enforcement case. Encourages public-private partnerships, education, and awareness to combat smuggling, counterfeit goods, environmental crimes, illicit cigarettes, human trafficking, and other illicit markets. Directs attention to the need for cooperation among governments, enforcement agencies, industry, and civil society and highlights research and enforcement examples as the basis for increased outreach and collaboration. The language is declaratory and does not create new legal requirements or appropriate funds.
Official title: Expressing support for the designation of June 11, 2026, as "Anti-Illicit Trade Awareness Day".
Introduced June 22, 2026 by Bill Cassidy · Last progress June 22, 2026