Sponsors (2)
The resolution strengthens statutory protections for speech and treats social media as public forums—bolstering legal defenses against platform censorship—while risking diplomatic friction, higher compliance/moderation costs, and reduced cross-border content-safety cooperation.
All U.S. persons: the bill explicitly reaffirms freedom of speech as a fundamental constitutional right and recognizes social media as public forums, strengthening legal protections for online expression and arguments against platform censorship.
Tech platforms and users: characterizing the EU's Digital Services Act as coercive may prompt U.S. platforms to adopt defensive legal or technical measures, increasing compliance and moderation costs that could be passed on to users or advertisers.
Content-safety and governance: the bill's strong preamble findings could encourage policies that limit cooperation with foreign content-moderation standards, reducing cross-border content-safety coordination and increasing moderation burdens on U.S. platforms.
Diplomacy and national security: asserting that EU regulatory actions directly threaten U.S. speech may strain diplomatic relations and could provoke reciprocal measures that affect trade or international cooperation.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Expresses concern that the EU Digital Services Act and EU enforcement actions threaten free speech and may chill expression in the U.S.
Official title: Expressing that any attempt by foreign entities to censor or penalize constitutionally protected speech of United States persons shall be opposed.
Introduced December 17, 2025 by Mike Lee · Last progress December 17, 2025
Declares that freedom of speech is a fundamental constitutional right and asserts that the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) and certain EU enforcement actions threaten free expression in U.S. public forums like social media. The text cites recent EU actions (including a high-profile threat and a multi-million dollar fine against X) and warns the DSA’s fines and extra-territorial pressure could chill speech and conflict with U.S. sovereignty.