Expressing that any attempt by foreign entities to censor or penalize constitutionally protected speech of United States persons shall be opposed.

Summary

Declares that freedom of speech is a fundamental constitutional right of U.S. persons and asserts that public forums, including social media, help protect that right. States a policy view that foreign laws—specifically the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA)—are pressuring platforms to remove speech, threatening fines, and therefore risk chilling free expression if left unchecked. Summarizes alleged EU actions and fines as examples of undue foreign influence on U.S. speech rights and concludes that such influence conflicts with the U.S. Government’s duty to protect constitutional rights.

• Affirms freedom of speech as a fundamental constitutional right of U.S. persons.
• Identifies public forums, including social media, as important venues for exercising free speech.
• Asserts that foreign regulation—specifically the EU’s Digital Services Act—threatens U.S. free speech by compelling content removal and imposing large fines.
• Cites specific alleged enforcement actions and fines as examples of the DSA’s effect on platforms.
• Frames foreign regulatory pressure as potentially chilling speech on platforms used by U.S. persons.
• Concludes that such foreign actions conflict with the U.S. Government’s responsibility to safeguard constitutional rights.
• Is primarily declaratory in nature, stating findings and a policy position rather than creating new spending or regulatory programs.