Sponsors (11)
The bill protects individuals' and federal employees' ability to possess and avoid federal regulation of higher‑capacity magazines and clarifies legal definitions, but it overrides local magazine‑capacity limits—raising public safety risks, shifting costs to communities and first responders, and reducing local policymaking authority.
Gun owners in state and local jurisdictions retain the ability to buy and possess higher‑capacity magazines without new local penalties.
Federal employees are prohibited from creating or enforcing capacity‑based magazine restrictions, reducing the chance of new federal regulations on magazine capacity.
Law enforcement and state governments gain clearer definition of 'firearm magazine, capacity,' providing legal certainty for enforcement and litigation.
Residents in jurisdictions that passed magazine‑capacity limits lose local protections intended to reduce mass‑shooting lethality.
Law enforcement and first responders face increased public safety risks from wider civilian access to higher‑capacity magazines.
State and local governments lose local control over magazine‑capacity policy and may incur litigation costs challenging the federal preemption.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Prohibits federal officers and employees from enforcing any federal, state, or local limits, prohibitions, or penalties that are based on the capacity (number of rounds) of a firearm magazine, and invalidates state and local laws that impose such capacity-based restrictions. The bill also defines "firearm magazine, capacity" as the number of rounds a fixed or detachable device can store and feed into a firearm and makes these rules enforceable for conduct occurring 30 or more days after enactment.
Introduced July 17, 2025 by Tony Wied · Last progress July 17, 2025