The bill makes it easier for states to carry out prescribed burns and increases EPA petition transparency, but risks weakening enforcement and ignoring emissions that could harm local air quality while adding complexity that may slow regulatory decisions.
State governments and prescribed‑fire practitioners: monitoring data from routine mitigation burns can be excluded from regulatory actions, preventing penalization and supporting use of prescribed fire for wildfire risk reduction.
EPA and the public: EPA must publish and keep a monthly-updated public website tracking petitions, improving transparency and public access to petition status and agency responsiveness.
State governments and rural communities: multistate air quality events will be handled using regional modeling and analysis, enabling more coordinated, science-based determinations across jurisdictions.
Nearby residents and local communities: treating prescribed burns and similar monitoring data as exceptions may allow increased emissions to be ignored, worsening local air quality and posing health risks.
Pollution enforcement and the public: excluding certain monitoring data from regulatory use can weaken enforcement against stationary sources, reducing accountability for polluters.
State and local governments and permit applicants: shifting determinations to regional modeling/analysis could add complexity and slow decision timelines, delaying regulatory actions or permitting decisions.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Modifies Clean Air Act rules to expand/clarify "exceptional event" handling for wildfires and state wildfire‑risk mitigation, changes petition and regional modeling rules, and requires EPA to publish petition status online monthly.
Changes how the Clean Air Act treats air monitoring data from wildfires and state wildfire‑risk reduction actions. It expands the legal definition of an “exceptional event,” adds an explicit list of things that are excluded from that definition, and creates a new defined term for state‑authorized actions to reduce wildfire fuel (like prescribed burns). The bill also updates the petition and demonstration process so states can seek exclusion for monitoring data tied to wildfire or fuel‑reduction actions, requires regional modeling or analysis for multistate events or multistate petitions, directs EPA to publish and monthly‑update petition status on a public website within 12 months, clarifies how excluded data may be omitted from various regulatory uses (designations, attainment determinations, SIP reviews, preconstruction permitting demonstrations), and repeals a prior paragraph in that Clean Air Act subsection.
Introduced December 3, 2025 by Gabe Evans · Last progress April 27, 2026