Sponsors
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Creates a 10-year EPA-led program to identify, require reporting on, and phase out nonessential uses and releases of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It requires manufacturers and users to report PFAS use, file 10-year phaseout plans, and meet strict product bans and a zero-release goal within 10 years, while giving EPA monitoring, inspection, enforcement, and fee authority. The measure also funds two PFAS research Centers, strengthens civil and criminal enforcement tools, amends certain liability and bankruptcy rules for PFAS-related claims, and preserves state authority to set stricter standards.
The bill offers significantly stronger federal tools, science funding, and enforcement to reduce PFAS exposure and expand cleanup capacity—especially for contaminated communities—but does so at the cost of substantial compliance burdens, potential price and availability impacts, regulatory uncertainty for businesses, and shifted local infrastructure and fiscal responsibilities.
Residents in communities near contamination (including low-income, rural, and urban communities) will see reduced PFAS exposure and stronger protections because the bill phases out nonessential uses, tightens 'safer-alternative' criteria, and gives EPA and citizens emergency, injunctive, and civil-enforcement tools that consider cumulative harms.
Researchers, regional labs, and affected communities get expanded PFAS detection, remediation, and technical capacity through two federally supported Centers, validated detection-method development, National Academies reviews, and $25M in startup funding, accelerating better cleanup tools and safer drinking water.
EPA can more effectively target and reduce PFAS releases because the bill identifies regulated entities (manufacturers, importers, exporters, processors), requires public reporting and phaseout plans, and shifts federal procurement away from PFAS-containing products, increasing transparency and lowering government-driven demand.
Manufacturers, importers, sellers, and small businesses will face substantial compliance, reformulation, testing, reporting, and phase-out costs that can raise prices, reduce product availability, and cause business losses—impacting consumers (especially low-income households) and small firms.
Broad statutory definitions and extensive EPA discretion, combined with public-disclosure requirements (subject to CBI rules) and relatively rapid phaseout timelines, create regulatory uncertainty and confidentiality concerns that could slow proprietary innovation and complicate business planning.
Municipalities, utilities, and treatment works may shoulder disposal and treatment burdens for PFAS-containing waste because some handlers are excluded from 'manufacturer'/'user' definitions, shifting costs to local governments and risking strain on water and waste infrastructure.
Introduced March 19, 2026 by Richard Joseph Durbin · Last progress March 19, 2026