Changes the numerical size thresholds that determine which facilities fall under the Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) regulatory coverage by amending the statute that defines those thresholds. It increases some aboveground storage capacity cutoffs (for example, replacing a 20,000‑gallon threshold with 42,000 gallons), updates other smaller numeric thresholds, and removes one subsection from the existing statutory language.
Amend subsection (b), paragraph (1)(B) by striking “20,000” and inserting “42,000”.
Amend subsection (b), paragraph (2)(A) to read: “an aggregate aboveground storage capacity greater than 10,000 gallons but less than 42,000 gallons; and;”.
Amend subsection (b), paragraph (3), subparagraph (A) to read: “with an aggregate aboveground storage capacity of less than or equal to 10,000 gallons; and; and”.
In subsection (b), paragraph (3), subparagraph (B) change the punctuation by striking and inserting a period.
Strike paragraph (4) of subsection (b).
Who is affected and how:
Owners/operators of facilities with aboveground oil or petroleum storage: Most directly affected. They must re-evaluate their storage inventories against the new numeric thresholds to determine whether they are newly covered or newly excluded from SPCC obligations. Facilities moving out of coverage could stop preparing or maintaining SPCC plans; facilities remaining in coverage maintain existing obligations.
Facility operators and environmental compliance managers: Will see changes in workload and compliance costs — some will have lower compliance costs if they fall below new thresholds, while others’ obligations will be unchanged.
Regulators (EPA and state agencies implementing SPCC): Must adjust enforcement, guidance, inspection checklists, and outreach to reflect the updated statutory thresholds.
Local communities and environmental stakeholders: Indirectly affected by any shift in the number of facilities subject to SPCC protections; fewer covered facilities could raise concerns about increased spill risks in some locations, while proponents will cite reduced regulatory burden for small operations.
Industry service providers (consultants, plan preparers): May see reduced demand from small facilities that are no longer covered; demand remains for covered facilities to develop and maintain plans.
Net effect:
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Last progress June 11, 2025 (8 months ago)
Introduced on June 11, 2025 by Rick Crawford