Sponsors (9)
This is not an official government website.
Copyright © 2026 PLEJ LC. All rights reserved.
Conditions a state's receipt of federal child abuse prevention funds on not taking adverse actions or discriminating against parents, guardians, or legal representatives who oppose medical, surgical, pharmacological, psychological, social, or identity-related interventions intended to transition or affirm a minor’s asserted gender identity. It adds a new requirement to the child abuse prevention statute and gives affected parents a private right to sue in court to stop the award of funds and seek return of funds paid in violation of the rule. The change applies even if a minor has a medical diagnosis (including gender dysphoria or related diagnoses) and ties compliance directly to federal funding, creating an enforcement path through litigation and potential fund recovery.
The bill strengthens parental authority and lets parents privately sue to block federal CAPTA funding for States that support gender‑affirming care for minors over parental objections, at the cost of potential reduced access to care for transgender youth, funding and litigation risks for States, and legal uncertainty for providers and child‑welfare systems.
Parents and legal guardians are protected from state actions that would penalize them for opposing gender‑affirming interventions for their minor children, preserving parental decision‑making authority.
Parents and legal guardians gain a private right of action to sue to stop federal CAPTA funding to States they allege are noncompliant, creating an enforcement path that does not rely on HHS to initiate action.
Limits how States may use CAPTA funding in ways that could be interpreted as supporting or facilitating gender‑affirming treatments for minors when parents object, potentially reducing state interventions some families view as intrusive.
Minors who seek gender‑affirming medical or social support may face reduced access to care or protective services if States avoid actions that could be legally challenged and risk losing CAPTA funds.
States could lose CAPTA funding or incur costly litigation and repayment orders if courts find they discriminated under the statute, reducing resources available for child abuse prevention and related services.
The statute's fixed definition of a child's 'biological sex' (as determined at or before birth) excludes medical diagnoses and may conflict with existing medical standards, creating legal uncertainty for healthcare providers and child‑welfare workers.
Introduced March 5, 2025 by Harriet Hageman · Last progress March 5, 2025