Sponsors (14)
The bill prioritizes privacy and clearer administrative rules for sex-separated school facilities but does so at the expense of transgender students' access, dignity, mental health, and creates legal and cost risks for schools.
Cisgender students in schools would have increased privacy in locker rooms and similar sex-separated facilities because the bill prevents cross-sex presence while rooms are in active use.
K-12 districts, colleges, and other education programs would have clearer, enforceable Title IX rules to manage locker-room access, reducing ambiguity for administrators and staff.
Transgender students whose gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth would be barred from using facilities that match their gender identity, restricting access, privacy, and dignity.
Students forced to use separate or non-preferred facilities may face increased stigmatization, bullying, and mental-health harms.
The rule could create legal conflicts with existing nondiscrimination laws and local policies that protect gender identity, producing legal uncertainty for school districts and colleges.
Based on analysis of 3 sections of legislative text.
Makes it unlawful under Title IX for a person whose sex was recorded at birth to use a locker room while people of a different sex are actively using it in Title IX-covered educational programs.
Prohibits a person whose sex is defined solely by reproductive biology and genetics at birth from using a locker room when that locker room is in active use by people of a different sex in any education program or activity covered by Title IX, and treats such use as unlawful under Title IX. The rule takes effect 30 days after enactment. Covered educational institutions will need to change policies and practices for locker-room access to comply; the measure may lead to increased Title IX complaints, administrative burdens, and litigation over its application and scope.
Introduced March 27, 2025 by Mary E. Miller · Last progress March 27, 2025