Sponsors
Introduced August 15, 2025 by Michael Lawler · Last progress August 15, 2025
The bill streamlines law and gives the State Department more operational flexibility, but it removes statutory language that may currently protect staff or underpin programs, creating short-term uncertainty and requiring internal or regulatory fixes.
Department of State staff and operations: Removing the outdated statutory requirement gives the State Department greater managerial and operational flexibility, reducing administrative constraints on how programs are carried out.
State and federal legal/compliance teams: Eliminates a possibly superseded provision in the U.S. Code, simplifying legal review and reducing the compliance and paperwork burden for agencies and state governments.
Department of State staff: Repeal may remove an explicit statutory authority or employee protection, requiring rulemaking or internal policy changes and potentially weakening legal safeguards for employees.
State governments and federal programs: Eliminating the statute could create temporary legal uncertainty for programs, contracts, or practices that relied on the repealed provision until regulatory or statutory replacements are adopted, disrupting implementation.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Removes 22 U.S.C. 4862 (the codified text of section 414 of the 1986 Act) from the United States Code by repealing that statutory provision.
Repeals 22 U.S.C. 4862 (the statutory text of section 414 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), removing that provision from the United States Code. The bill also sets a short title for the act. The direct legal action is a repeal of a single existing statute; it does not appropriate funds or create new programs. Exact downstream effects depend on what that removed provision had required or restricted and how federal agencies and recipients adjust to the change.