Sponsors
The bill enhances congressional and national security understanding of foreign terrorist and technology‑enabled threats to guide capability and funding decisions, but does so by concentrating classified information in a small group, reducing public transparency and risking higher costs and politicization.
Nationwide security: The bill requires analysis of FTO/SDGT use of AI and identifies DHS capability and resource gaps, helping the U.S. anticipate technology‑enabled threats and target funding or program changes to strengthen border and counterterrorism defenses.
Improved congressional oversight: Members of Congress receive regular, classified threat assessments on FTOs/SDGTs in major non‑NATO allies, enabling more informed policymaking and legislative oversight of related security programs.
Reduced public transparency: Delivering threat assessments as classified materials limits public visibility and broader scrutiny of threat findings and policy choices, weakening public accountability.
Potential higher taxpayer costs: Identifying DHS resource shortfalls could prompt increased DHS spending or reallocation of funds, raising costs for taxpayers or diverting resources from other programs.
Risk of politicization and uneven information sharing: Restricting detailed threat and capability information to certain Members of Congress risks selective dissemination or politicized use of intelligence rather than a consistent congressional response.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Requires DHS, with State and DNI, to deliver classified biennial threat assessments on FTOs/SDGTs in major non‑NATO allies, including tech use and DHS resource needs.
Introduced March 30, 2026 by Matt Van Epps · Last progress March 30, 2026
Requires the Department of Homeland Security, working with the State Department and the Director of National Intelligence, to produce classified threat assessments about foreign terrorist groups and designated global terrorists operating in countries designated as major non‑NATO allies. The first report must be delivered to two congressional committees within 180 days of enactment and then every two years, with briefings for Members of Congress and identification of any extra resources DHS needs to respond. Each assessment must name the terrorist groups present in each major non‑NATO ally, describe their activities (including use of AI and other critical or emerging technologies), evaluate the ally’s counterterrorism efforts and cooperation with U.S. intelligence, and review DHS’s ability to detect, monitor, mitigate, and prevent entry of members of those groups.