Who is affected and how:

• Noncitizens whose visas are revoked under the specified statutory grounds are directly affected: a revocation will now trigger immediate removal proceedings, accelerating the transition from an administrative visa revocation to a deportation case and shortening the time before formal charging and court processing.
• Department of Homeland Security enforcement components must implement the immediate-start requirement; that may require new or clarified internal processes and could increase near-term operational workload to identify revocations and file charges without delay.
• Immigration courts and the Executive Office for Immigration Review will likely receive more expedited filings tied to these revocations, increasing scheduling and docketing demands and potentially changing prioritization of cases.
• Federal courts and courts reviewing immigration decisions will be affected by the statutory limitation on judicial review. That limitation may reduce the number or scope of pre-removal judicial challenges and could prompt litigation over the constitutionality or scope of review restrictions.
• Legal service providers and immigration attorneys will face compressed timelines for advice, representation, and pre-removal interventions in cases where a visa revocation triggers immediate proceedings.

Broader effects and risks:

• Accelerated proceedings can reduce time for noncitizens to secure counsel or prepare defenses, potentially affecting due process and the fairness of proceedings.
• Limits on judicial review may expedite removals but could raise legal challenges about access to courts and remedies; courts may be asked to interpret the permitted scope of review and whether constitutional claims remain reviewable.
• The amendment does not allocate funding; implementation burden falls on DHS and EOIR under existing appropriations, which could strain resources if filings rise.

Overall, the amendment narrows the procedural gap between visa revocation for the listed grounds and formal removal action, increasing enforcement speed and reducing judicial oversight in specified circumstances.