Sponsors (2)
The bill seeks to modernize and make regulatory review more transparent and efficient through machine-readable rules and AI-enabled retrospective review—potentially reducing burdens on businesses and improving oversight—but it raises costs, deadlines-driven implementation risks, algorithmic-bias concerns, and privacy/security trade-offs.
Small businesses and taxpayers will get agency rules published in machine-readable form, making regulations easier to search, analyze, and reuse.
Small businesses and taxpayers may face fewer obsolete or duplicative rules because agencies must use technology and AI for retrospective regulatory review to identify and reduce unnecessary regulatory burden.
Taxpayers gain greater transparency and potential congressional oversight because agencies must create plans and meet deadlines for regulatory review and implementation.
Taxpayers and federal employees will bear increased federal costs as agencies procure technology, train staff, and produce implementation plans, potentially diverting resources from other programs.
People and businesses subject to regulations risk biased or erroneous outcomes if algorithmic tools and AI used in reviews are not validated, which could lead to improper removal or alteration of rules.
Federal, state, and local government staff may be strained by the bill's short statutory deadlines (e.g., 180 days, 18 months, 2 years), increasing the risk of cursory reviews or checklist compliance rather than substantive reform.
Based on analysis of 2 sections of legislative text.
Requires OMB to report on machine‑readable regulations and eCFR recognition, issue AI/technology guidance for retrospective review, and requires agencies to submit and implement review plans on set timelines.
Introduced February 20, 2025 by Mike Lee · Last progress February 20, 2025
Requires OMB (via OIRA), working with the Government Publishing Office, the Archivist, and the Federal Register, to report quickly on how well federal agencies are making their regulations available in machine‑readable form and on whether the eCFR should be recognized as an official legal edition. Directs OMB/OIRA to issue guidance within 18 months on using technology — including algorithmic tools and AI — and training staff to carry out retrospective regulatory reviews. Agencies must submit plans within two years detailing how they will follow that guidance, identify rules appropriate for post‑issuance review, and then start the reviews within 180 days after submitting their plans.