Sponsors
The bill increases legal clarity and pushes to protect U.S. sovereignty from ICC activities on U.S. soil, but does so at the risk of diplomatic strain, administrative costs, and reduced flexibility in applying evolving international law.
U.S. taxpayers and the federal government could gain greater protection of U.S. sovereignty if diplomats secure a binding prohibition on ICC use of UN facilities on U.S. soil, limiting external judicial activity on American territory.
Federal agencies, courts, law enforcement, and diplomats obtain clearer, legally consistent definitions (including which UN Headquarters Agreement governs) to apply this Act, reducing ambiguity in implementation and legal disputes.
U.S. diplomatic representatives are given a clear timeline and directive (within 30 days of the 80th General Assembly opening) to pursue U.S. policy at the UN, enabling faster executive action and clearer congressional oversight of diplomatic priorities.
U.S. taxpayers and national interests could face strained relations with the UN and other member states, diminishing cooperation on security, humanitarian, and multilateral initiatives.
Federal diplomats and embassy staff may face increased negotiation burdens and diverted time/resources to secure a contested agreement, complicating U.S. diplomacy and other multilateral work.
Pursuing unilateral restrictions could prompt reciprocal measures, treaty disputes, or litigation, creating legal and administrative costs for the U.S. government and taxpayers.
Based on analysis of 4 sections of legislative text.
Requires the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. to seek a supplemental agreement barring the U.N. from hosting or allowing the ICC to use U.N. facilities in the United States.
Introduced March 4, 2025 by Charles Roy · Last progress March 4, 2025
Requires the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations to seek, within 30 days after the opening date of the 80th U.N. General Assembly session, a supplemental agreement to the U.N. Headquarters Agreement that would bar the U.N. from hosting, leasing, or otherwise allowing the International Criminal Court (ICC) to use U.S. facilities. The bill also records findings about the U.S. relationship with international organizations, notes the Senate has not ratified the Rome Statute, and defines key terms used in the measure. The measure does not appropriate funds or create new programs; it directs diplomatic negotiations aimed at preventing the ICC from operating out of U.N. facilities located in the United States (notably in New York City).